Subscribe for updates

Yes, Blame the Collective Left for the Violence

When a gunman opened fire at Charlie Kirk, many voices rushed to scold conservatives for “blaming the left.” They wanted to blur the lines, to insist that “both sides” are the same. That is a lie, and it must be named.

The American right, at its core, is about individualism. The freedom to think, to speak, to build, to worship, to defend one’s home and one’s future. The left, by contrast, is about collectivism. Its survival depends on conformity. The left tolerates no deviation, no dissent. It operates like the Borg: a hive where individual thought is sacrificed on the altar of the cause.

Here is the trap: the collectivist demands that the individualist behave as a lone wolf. “Stand apart,” they say, “don’t generalize, don’t organize, don’t resist.” That is how the collective wins. One man at a time. One voice silenced at a time. One target isolated and destroyed while the swarm advances.

We Are Not The Same

But this is where the left misunderstands the right. We do not dissolve into a hive mind, but neither do we fight alone. Free men and women cooperate. Cooperation is not collectivism—it is the deliberate choice of individuals to stand shoulder to shoulder while retaining their freedom of mind and soul. This is how we built families, churches, militias, and ultimately a nation.

We are identifying the source of evil, not creating a mirror image of it.

So when we “blame the left,” we are not blaming random individuals. We are naming the ideology that binds them into a machine of obedience—a machine that justifies violence, censorship, and intimidation. We are identifying the source of evil, not creating a mirror image of it.

Resistance to collectivism is not futile. In fact, it is inevitable. The collective crushes creativity, smothers truth, and demands submission. The cooperative multiplies strength without erasing freedom. The collective is a cage; the cooperative is a covenant.

America was not founded by a collective. It was founded by individuals who cooperated—farmers, printers, blacksmiths, and lawyers—each keeping his identity, yet joining in a cause larger than himself. That is why we will prevail. Not as drones in a hive, but as free men in a brotherhood.

We are the cooperative. And we will not be conquered.

If you like what we write,

Please consider supporting this site

Our goal is to make all of our content freely available with no paywalls or mandatory subscriptions. This information is important, but publicizing it is not free.  If you would like to help keep these articles free, we could use your help. Thank you!

Donations

Your Single Donation Matters

Please choose to make a one-time donation to the Americanist Journal.

Monthly Donation

If you can, a monthly donation would be greatly appreciated. If you choose to do this, you will receive a monthly copy of The Americanist Journal in your email inbox. Never miss an article.

$0.00 for each month
No payment items has been selected yet

Your Single Donation Matters

Please choose to make a one-time donation to the Americanist Journal.

Monthly Donation

If you can, a monthly donation would be greatly appreciated. If you choose to do this, you will receive a monthly copy of The Americanist Journal in your email inbox. Never miss an article.

$0.00 for each month
No payment items has been selected yet
Share the Post:

Related Posts

THE WHIPSAW OF HUMOR: Why Offense Makes Us More Honest

In a low-ceilinged comedy club, a comedian tells a joke about American Indians that leans on a stereotype everyone in the room already recognizes, and the laugh comes fast—not because the audience believes the caricature, but because they recognize it as a cliché—then the whipsaw snaps back, and in the quiet half-second after the laugh, minds start correcting the record, recalling Native soldiers, engineers, artists, leaders, and neighbors, noticing the absurdity of the stereotype more clearly precisely because it was spoken aloud, reduced to a cartoon and exposed, doing what suppression never does by dragging a lazy idea into the light where it shrinks, destabilizes, and collapses under the weight of lived reality rather than being preserved intact by silence.

Read More

Why Is Government Power Supposed To Be Safer Than Corporate Power?

Power doesn’t become safer because it promises good intentions. The modern Left condemns concentrated authority in corporations, yet celebrates it in government, insisting elections make bureaucracy accountable. But when voters deliver an unwelcome result, the administrative state does not submit—it resists, litigates, and shelters itself behind courts and procedure. That reaction exposes the truth this piece explores: bureaucracy answers less to ballots than to its own permanence. History is clear on where this leads—power that believes itself righteous soon decides it no longer needs restraint.

Read More