Subscribe for updates

The Climate Cartel Just Got Dismantled — And the American People Finally Have a Voice

This new climate assessment — authored not by activists but by honest scientists like Judith Curry, Steven Koonin, and John Christy — concludes what working Americans already know in their bones: The climate may change. But that doesn’t mean we need to destroy the economy to please Europe or save face at the UN. This report puts America first — not the Green Industrial Complex. It’s a stake through the heart of globalist energy mandates and a rare moment of moral clarity from within the federal government. Let’s call it what it is: A Declaration of Energy Independence — backed by reason, not religious hysteria.

For too long, the conversation around “climate change” in this country has been monopolized by a self-anointed elite: Silicon Valley investors, Ivy League modelers, and green-tech grifters who have never shoveled coal, fixed a generator, or paid a utility bill without taxpayer help. They don’t represent the people. They represent the racket.

But something just cracked. And it wasn’t the ozone layer.

It was their narrative.

On July 29th, the Department of Energy — under Secretary Chris Wright — released a report that didn’t bow to the bureaucratic catechism of carbon guilt. It challenged it. It examined the actual, observable data from America’s climate and laid bare a truth most politicians are too afraid to say:

America’s prosperity is not the problem. It’s the solution.

This new climate assessment — authored not by activists but by honest scientists like Judith Curry, Steven Koonin, and John Christy — concludes what working Americans already know in their bones:

The climate may change. But that doesn’t mean we need to destroy the economy to please Europe or save face at the UN.

This report puts America first — not the Green Industrial Complex.

It’s a stake through the heart of globalist energy mandates and a rare moment of moral clarity from within the federal government.

Let’s call it what it is:

A Declaration of Energy Independence — backed by reason, not religious hysteria.

What It Gets Right — and Why It Matters

Unlike the United Nations reports written by committees of career bureaucrats and modelers with vested interests in panic, this DOE assessment dares to do something revolutionary:

It distinguishes observation from ideology. It exposes the costs of climate policy, not just the costs of warming. It rejects the false god of “net zero” and restores man to his rightful place as steward — not servant — of the Earth.

This isn’t a climate “denial.”

This is a climate reformation — a return to evidence, humility, and sovereignty.

The Real Question: Who Benefits from Panic?

For the last two decades, climate policy hasn’t been about the climate.

It’s been about control.

Control over what cars you drive.

Control over how you heat your home.

Control over what industries survive — and which ones are sacrificed on the altar of “sustainability.”

And who profits?

Not the welder in Ohio. Not the farmer in Kansas. Not the line worker in Louisiana.

No, the winners are the wind lobby, the solar subsidy class, and the virtue-signaling elites with their carbon credits and private jets to Davos.

This new report from the DOE is the first step in tearing that racket down. Not to be “anti-science.” But to finally be pro-truth. And pro-American.

This Is What Fighting Back Looks Like

Make no mistake: the climate cartel will attack this report.

They’ll say the authors are fringe. That the data is flawed. That we’re all going to drown if we don’t pass another trillion-dollar spending bill.

But their panic is the sound of power slipping from their hands.

For the first time in years, the facts are being set free — and the people are being trusted to think for themselves.

This isn’t just about science. It’s about self-government.

It’s about liberty.

And for once, it’s not the billionaire class that gets to write the rules.

It’s the people. And we should write them in bold ink, just as our forefathers did.

If you like what we write,

Please consider supporting this site

Our goal is to make all of our content freely available with no paywalls or mandatory subscriptions. This information is important, but publicizing it is not free.  If you would like to help keep these articles free, we could use your help. Thank you!

Donations

Your Single Donation Matters

Please choose to make a one-time donation to the Americanist Journal.

Monthly Donation

If you can, a monthly donation would be greatly appreciated. If you choose to do this, you will receive a monthly copy of The Americanist Journal in your email inbox. Never miss an article.

$0.00 for each month
No payment items has been selected yet

Your Single Donation Matters

Please choose to make a one-time donation to the Americanist Journal.

Monthly Donation

If you can, a monthly donation would be greatly appreciated. If you choose to do this, you will receive a monthly copy of The Americanist Journal in your email inbox. Never miss an article.

$0.00 for each month
No payment items has been selected yet
Share the Post:

Related Posts

THE WHIPSAW OF HUMOR: Why Offense Makes Us More Honest

In a low-ceilinged comedy club, a comedian tells a joke about American Indians that leans on a stereotype everyone in the room already recognizes, and the laugh comes fast—not because the audience believes the caricature, but because they recognize it as a cliché—then the whipsaw snaps back, and in the quiet half-second after the laugh, minds start correcting the record, recalling Native soldiers, engineers, artists, leaders, and neighbors, noticing the absurdity of the stereotype more clearly precisely because it was spoken aloud, reduced to a cartoon and exposed, doing what suppression never does by dragging a lazy idea into the light where it shrinks, destabilizes, and collapses under the weight of lived reality rather than being preserved intact by silence.

Read More

Why Is Government Power Supposed To Be Safer Than Corporate Power?

Power doesn’t become safer because it promises good intentions. The modern Left condemns concentrated authority in corporations, yet celebrates it in government, insisting elections make bureaucracy accountable. But when voters deliver an unwelcome result, the administrative state does not submit—it resists, litigates, and shelters itself behind courts and procedure. That reaction exposes the truth this piece explores: bureaucracy answers less to ballots than to its own permanence. History is clear on where this leads—power that believes itself righteous soon decides it no longer needs restraint.

Read More