Subscribe for updates

Eradicating Delusion, Not People: The Moral Imperative to Tell the Truth

Words matter. Definitions matter. Reality matters.

But in today’s twisted cultural moment, the simple act of saying “this is false” is treated like a declaration of war. Say that race is a social construct with no bearing on human worth? You’re accused of racism. Say that a man cannot become a woman? You’re labeled a genocidal maniac.

 

Let’s set the record straight.

When we say we want to eradicate racism, no one thinks we mean wiping out people of color. They know — or used to know — that racism is a belief system, a lie built on the illusion that skin pigmentation dictates virtue, intelligence, or destiny. Eradicating racism means exposing and eliminating that lie. It means restoring the truth that all men are created equal — endowed by their Creator with unalienable rights, not doled out by government according to the color wheel.

But say we want to eradicate transgenderism — and suddenly the very same logic gets flipped upside down. Now, we’re told, it means we want to wipe out people who call themselves transgender. That’s nonsense. It’s slander. And it’s dangerous.

Transgenderism is not a person. It is an ideology. A metaphysical claim that the human mind can override biology. That a boy can be born in the wrong body. That womanhood is a feeling, not a fact. It is, in no uncertain terms, a delusion.

Let’s be blunt: human beings cannot change sex. They can mutilate their bodies, fill their bloodstream with synthetic hormones, wear the costume, and demand that everyone clap. But a man is not a woman. And a woman is not a man. Not by feeling. Not by surgery. Not by social consensus.

 

Reality is not up for debate.

We don’t tolerate flat-Earth theorists running the GPS satellites. We don’t let schizophrenics dictate the weather report because they “identify” as the moon. Yet we’re told that denying a boy’s claim to girlhood is violence, while filling his bloodstream with estrogen is compassion.

This is not just a harmless belief. It’s a civilizational toxin. Like racism, it warps the truth. It splits people into warring tribes based on phantom identities. It infects children with confusion and floods them with shame for simply being who they are. It erodes language, law, medicine, and education. It punishes clarity and rewards deception. And worst of all — it demands that the rest of us participate in the charade.

 

What we’re fighting is not people. We are fighting lies.

Just as we rightly seek to abolish racism — not by erasing people of any race, but by erasing the poisonous belief that race defines humanity — so must we seek to abolish transgenderism, by removing the false belief that identity can override biology. This is not cruelty. This is mercy. This is not hate. This is rescue.

And let’s say it even louder for the ones in the back: transgender people are not being genocided when we say the ideology is false. No more than racists are being genocided when we say racism is false. To claim otherwise is emotional blackmail — a weaponized lie designed to shut down truth-telling.

The truth is that both “race” and “transgender identity” are inventions. Social constructs with no scientific backbone and no moral standing. Skin color has nothing to do with character or capability. Biological sex is not alterable. These are not identities. They are illusions.

And illusions — when turned into policy, law, and cultural dogma — destroy.

The only way to preserve civil society is to re-anchor it in truth. To banish the delusions. To stop pretending that men can be women or that melanin measures merit. We do not build a better world by affirming lies. We build it by standing on reality — with courage, compassion, and unflinching moral clarity.

Let the record show: we do not hate people. We hate lies.
And we will not be silent while lies burn down the world.

 

If you like what we write,

Please consider supporting this site

Our goal is to make all of our content freely available with no paywalls or mandatory subscriptions. This information is important, but publicizing it is not free.  If you would like to help keep these articles free, we could use your help. Thank you!

Donations

Your Single Donation Matters

Please choose to make a one-time donation to the Americanist Journal.

Monthly Donation

If you can, a monthly donation would be greatly appreciated. If you choose to do this, you will receive a monthly copy of The Americanist Journal in your email inbox. Never miss an article.

$0.00 for each month
No payment items has been selected yet

Your Single Donation Matters

Please choose to make a one-time donation to the Americanist Journal.

Monthly Donation

If you can, a monthly donation would be greatly appreciated. If you choose to do this, you will receive a monthly copy of The Americanist Journal in your email inbox. Never miss an article.

$0.00 for each month
No payment items has been selected yet
Share the Post:

Related Posts

THE WHIPSAW OF HUMOR: Why Offense Makes Us More Honest

In a low-ceilinged comedy club, a comedian tells a joke about American Indians that leans on a stereotype everyone in the room already recognizes, and the laugh comes fast—not because the audience believes the caricature, but because they recognize it as a cliché—then the whipsaw snaps back, and in the quiet half-second after the laugh, minds start correcting the record, recalling Native soldiers, engineers, artists, leaders, and neighbors, noticing the absurdity of the stereotype more clearly precisely because it was spoken aloud, reduced to a cartoon and exposed, doing what suppression never does by dragging a lazy idea into the light where it shrinks, destabilizes, and collapses under the weight of lived reality rather than being preserved intact by silence.

Read More

Why Is Government Power Supposed To Be Safer Than Corporate Power?

Power doesn’t become safer because it promises good intentions. The modern Left condemns concentrated authority in corporations, yet celebrates it in government, insisting elections make bureaucracy accountable. But when voters deliver an unwelcome result, the administrative state does not submit—it resists, litigates, and shelters itself behind courts and procedure. That reaction exposes the truth this piece explores: bureaucracy answers less to ballots than to its own permanence. History is clear on where this leads—power that believes itself righteous soon decides it no longer needs restraint.

Read More